Inactive [SEC] Ore To Client Obfuscation v1.9.1.1 - Anti X-Ray (xray) [1.2.5-R4]

Discussion in 'Inactive/Unsupported Plugins' started by TyrOvC, Jul 12, 2011.

  1. Offline


    solarox5, DaveDee, kahlilnc and 27 others like this.
  2. Offline


    It works without spoutcraft.
  3. Offline


    So basically I should use the original craftbukkit jar and just add Spout and RawCritsOreObfuscrationPluginSpout and get rid of the RawcriticsOreObfuscation plugin?
  4. Offline


    Thanks for this great mod, we've been using it for a few days on a dedicated server and it's pure pleasure, doesn't lag much more than before except for chunk that aren't cachet yet, which isn't really an issue after some time.

    However, we found a few issues with the non spout version for CB1337, and the default enginemode (4)
    It seems that glass panes and stairs are seen as "plain" blocks by the algorithm, and so in some cases stone blocks gets transformed into ores when next to them, as you can see in this screenshot :

    Is there a quick fix for this?

    EDIT : My bad, you just have to edit the default config and add "101,102,104,105,106,107,108,109" as transparent blocks, there's also some nether stuff that could be added as transparent.
  5. Offline


    If you're opting for the Spout install, yes.

    Yeah, sorry for that! I forgot to update the default transparent ids.
  6. @TyrOvC
    Last question:
    What is better for my server performance? Spout version or the "original" (with .class files etc.)?
  7. Offline


    is there a way to fix when you /regen using world edit that the ore won't pop out or become visible after the /regen of a certain chunk?
  8. Offline


    I was also wondering which is recommended when it comes to performance. Thanks.
  9. Offline


    It's only visible to anyone who was standing there with you when you did the chunk regen. World edit stuff is ignored on purpose so that the size of operations you can do without your server decreasing is not affected. Is that something you really need?

    @VADemon @DoctorBoyd
    The original version is a bit faster since it has fewer function calls.
    DoctorBoyd and VADemon like this.
  10. Offline


    I think you could save a lot of CPU if engine 4 only sends diamond below level 20.
    Iron is worthless and I dont mind people using xray to get it.

    Also, could you make an engine that hides diamond in darkness ?

    EDIT by Moderator: merged posts, please use the edit button instead of double posting.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 17, 2016
  11. Offline


    anybody tested it to 1467? Whiout Spout does it work?
  12. Offline


    Doesn't work with #1467 :(

    Please update ASAP. This is the only plugin I have to wait for an update prior updating my server.
  13. Offline


    spout just got updated by the way.
  14. Offline


    It's working for me, B#1492, Spout 454
  15. Offline


    Does it work without Spout?
    HockeyMike24 likes this.
  16. Offline


  17. Offline


    Quick question....If I use the spout installation route will it block ores to all clients or just clients using the spout client, spoutcraft or whatever it's called.
  18. Offline


    all clients :
  19. Offline


    Why not only hide all blocks of a list (coal, iron, diamond, gold, lapis, mossy stone, chests, water, lava and so) and replace them to a fake stone? The highest proportion is stone. So why will be getting the stone to fake ores? I think there is the highest cpu cost consumption. I don't know exactly how Spout works, but i think this must be able to modify the network packets for client.

    Now in the latest version, ALL ores gets an fake -> more cpu ?

    1. OTC checks the chunks, which were sent to client if it contains blocks of the itemlist.
    2. Then it exchange the blocks to stone
    3. Only now the client gets the packets sent

    Or you got an idea to reduce the cpu costs?
  20. Offline


    where is the dev ? :(
  21. Offline


  22. Offline


    You can already do that, in other engine you don't see anything, or well almost anything, this is because of course the anti xray doesn't check ALL the blocks, some of them are likely not being checked by an example an error or bad calculus. SO this happends too when they get replaced for ores, the only thing is that if they get replaced people cannot see very far away or cannot identify wich ones are really ores.

    I prefer functionallity atm than reducing process :/, we can get very GOOD computers but not a PERFECT anti-xray.
  23. Offline



    Can I use: oreupdateradius=0 - to save even more CPU power ?

    BTW: Running Obfuscator on a 600+ server
  24. Offline


    Doesn't work with 1531?

    19:02:00 [SEVERE] java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: k
    19:02:00 [SEVERE]       at net.minecraft.server.Packet51MapChunk.<init>(Packet51
    19:02:00 [SEVERE]       at net.minecraft.server.Packet51MapChunk.<init>(Packet51
    19:02:00 [SEVERE]       at net.minecraft.server.EntityPlayer.a(
    19:02:00 [SEVERE]       at net.minecraft.server.NetServerHandler.a(NetServerHand
    19:02:00 [SEVERE]       at net.minecraft.server.Packet10Flying.a(SourceFile:126)
    19:02:00 [SEVERE]       at net.minecraft.server.NetworkManager.b(NetworkManager.
    19:02:00 [SEVERE]       at net.minecraft.server.NetServerHandler.a(NetServerHand
    19:02:00 [SEVERE]       at net.minecraft.server.NetworkListenThread.a(SourceFile
    19:02:00 [SEVERE]       at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.w(MinecraftServe
    19:02:00 [SEVERE]       at
    19:02:00 [SEVERE]       at
    19:02:00 [SEVERE] Unexpected exception
    java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: k
            at net.minecraft.server.Packet51MapChunk.<init>(
            at net.minecraft.server.Packet51MapChunk.<init>(
            at net.minecraft.server.EntityPlayer.a(
            at net.minecraft.server.NetServerHandler.a(
            at net.minecraft.server.Packet10Flying.a(SourceFile:126)
            at net.minecraft.server.NetworkManager.b(
            at net.minecraft.server.NetServerHandler.a(
            at net.minecraft.server.NetworkListenThread.a(SourceFile:108)
            at net.minecraft.server.MinecraftServer.w(
  25. Offline


    What's the Texture Pack/Mod for the 'Before' picture in the main post? I wish to test this, and it's hard to tell with other ones :p

    Also, which engine mode do you guys recommend for performance and efficient, working anti-xray?
  26. Mode 1. But u will be still able to see 10% of ores. But there're only few diamonds, more iron and gold and coal.
  27. Offline


    Does Engine 5 works for Spout version? and for Non-spout version? Because I tried it and it should transform all stones into random and it didn't, I could xray as normal.​
  28. I already reported this issue long ago. Mode 5 isnt working anymore, dont know why.
  29. Offline


    Well I don't know why Rawcritics doesn't update anymore or they do so slow.

    EDITED: Sorry I just see the owner of the plugin is on the BukkitDev all the time, not the post ;)
  30. Offline


    Waiting for the non-Spout version!
  31. Offline


Share This Page