Sorry, thought id rather search the forums and answer in an existing thread. Where else can i get infos? Start a new thread?
It leaves the question if its better to reduce the load on bukkits event system or not. If you have a full plugin suite your plugins can directly...
Wait... A wrapper for a wrapper for a wrapper? Next time we'll see the RegisterRegister.......
Umh its great that you want to continue developement for this, as i almost dropped everything related to bukkit. But: Build it against the last...
For the ten F***in thousands time. IF there is a method that you want to have in the Interface go add it!!! This is whole thing is !not! made to...
You and nijikokun have most obviously no clue what you are talking about. Anyway noone seems to want to work together. Rather go on and rule out...
Hoooray, i managed to merge branches ....
Is it correct that your pull request only includes a new file structure (everything inside the apis package) and you renamed the isEmpty method...
Seriously Raphfrk you talk things into the ground before they even got realized and you already have solutions for problems that dont even exist...
xZise: Oh, you are right, now the APIs reset when the APIHandler gets disabled. I hope you didnt get the feeling that i was gatekeeping the...
Then you most obviously didnt understand the idea of the APIHandler. The APIHandler doesnt prevent you from using your own interfaces it only...
to Raphfrk and xZise Any Custom interface would totally break the idea of this APIHandler. If there is a need for a certain Method, that should be...
Yeah well this is a problem i can ponly solve by calling the API handler aaaAPIHandler to make sure it gets loaded first. WOuld be nice if bukkit...
Umh just wanted to make a note here, that i created an APIHandler-Plugin which now needs to get its standards defined......
[IMG] <Edit by Moderator: Redacted mediafire url> ● <Edit by Moderator: Redacted mediafire url> ● <Edit by Moderator: Redacted mediafire url> As...
Bukkit has no built-in economy system.
Yeah i already made a thread about this in the plugin developer forum (was called "Interfaces Interfaces Interfaces") but people didnt seem to...
I discovered some weird bugs in combination with LWC When a doublechest is protected by LWC and you place a sign above one part of it, the lwc...
Should i throw the code into a trashcan now?
v0.3 <Edit by Moderator: Redacted mediafire url> Those weird duping bugs should be fixed now, as far as i could test it
Separate names with a comma.